CASE STUDIES

ARE AVAILABLE ON DESKTOP

RIZZ.MARKET — A PLATFORM FOR AD INTEGRATIONS BETWEEN BRANDS AND BLOGGERS, BUILT ON TELEGRAM MINI APP

TEAM

Product Manager, Developers

ROLE

Solo Product Designer

YEAR

2025 — 2026

The platform connects advertisers and bloggers: brands post campaigns, bloggers apply and create content, and the full deal lifecycle — legal paperwork, payments, and taxes — runs inside the app.


The video shows the flow of a blogger browsing the offer marketplace and responding to an advertising campaign.

CONVERSION ISSUES

MANDATORY ONBOARDING

8% CONVERSION

— Users received a list of what to do before starting work

— Users had to search the whole platform to find the needed actions from the list

— Signing the contract was long and difficult: all data was collected on one page, and some fields were repeated

MARKET → APPLY

15% CONVERSION

— The reward amount and type of cooperation were unclear

— Users did not understand that they had to buy the product themselves

— The final amount became clear only after completing the integration

— These issues reduced trust in the platform and hurt its reputation

INTEGRATION

75% CONVERSION

— Users had questions about the requirements and some steps

— Bloggers had to repeat the same steps several times

— Some users gave up before finishing

— Bloggers sent unprofessional messages in chats with advertisers

ANALYSIS

METRICS ANALYSIS

Identified where problems occur at each step, including drop-offs, dependencies, and scale

IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS

Identified why these problems occur through interviews with bloggers, integration managers, and technical support

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

Studied how other products explain complex terms, payment, and multi-step processes

CURRENT INTERFACE AND USER FLOW

Identified specific UX reasons for user drop-offs

CASE 1. ONBOARDING

Before

Before the redesign: the hub was essentially a drawer with a list of things that needed to be done. The original mockup was not preserved.

Hypothesis: If create a single clickable hub with mandatory actions, show progress, and remove fields the system already has data for, more users will complete the process

Solution

The redesign replaces a flat, disconnected checklist with one guided flow — from first-touch onboarding through registration to activation — where every step is visible, time-scoped, and impossible to lose progress on.

01 GUIDED ONBOARDING BEFORE REGISTRATION

Three onboarding screens introduce the service and explain how the platform works before the user is asked to register.

02 A HUB WITH CLEAR, TIME-SCOPED STEPS

The fourth screen is a hub for three mandatory registration steps required before responding to campaigns. A fourth optional step is the first integration unlocks a sign-up bonus.


Each step shows an estimated completion time, setting expectations and reducing drop-off on more complex tasks.

03 ONE CONTINUOUS FLOW INSTEAD OF A SCATTERED CHECKLIST

The three mandatory steps form a continuous flow, taking users directly from one step to the next without returning to the hub.

Completed steps remain marked on the hub, making progress easy to track at a glance.

04 SAVED PROGRESS AND NATURAL RE-ENTRY POINTS

Exiting via «Come back later» saves all entered data. Users can resume from a reminder banner on their profile, or when responding to an ad campaign, right when their motivation to finish naturally returns.

Results

Start registration → Sign contract

8% → 26%

conversion from starting registration to signing the contract increased 3.25x

CASE 2. OFFER MARKET AND BLOGGER APPLICATION FLOW

Before

Hypothesis: If reduce cognitive load and explain the reward and deal terms step by step, users will better understand the offer and find it easier to decide whether to respond

New market

Added onboarding in a stories format so users did not have to search for answers in support.

Banners highlighted extra earning opportunities.

The catalog structure became closer to familiar marketplaces, making relevant campaigns easier to find through categories.

Moved key parameters into filters so users could quickly exclude unsuitable campaigns.

Instead of a generic “Apply” button, the CTA started showing what mattered most — the integration price. I removed quick applications in favor of a more deliberate choice, which increased the number of bloggers who started working on campaigns after approval.

Social media logos made it immediately clear which platform the integration was for.

Badges for labeling and tax surfaced important legal terms directly on the card.

New product Page

CPM (per views)

Fixed fee

Barter

New application flow — V1 — Failed

Initially, the business insisted on a single screen, based on the hypothesis that it would lead to higher conversion.


However, usability testing showed that the screen was overloaded with numbers and difficult for users to understand.

New application flow — V2 — Successful

Results

Market → Apply

15% → 21%

conversion growth, accounting for traffic growth

Support requests

↓

fewer questions about payment formats

and collaboration terms

CASE 3. INTEGRATION PROCESS

Before

Before the redesign, the integrations page was just a single list of things to upload, with no explanations or guidelines.

Hypothesis: If the necessary instructions, checks,

and communication are embedded directly into the integration process, users will make fewer mistakes without manager or support involvement

Solution

01 Split the integration into sequential steps

Each step became a separate screen with its own statuses, deadlines, and tasks.

02 MOVED INSTRUCTIONS INTO THE PROCESS

The user received tips exactly when they were needed: how to attach a receipt; what a review should look like; which ERID to insert; and which publication requirements applied.

Step 1
Product order

Step 2
Marketplace review

Step 3
Content (with labeling)

STEP 3
Content (native)

Step 4
Social media publication

03 REPLACED FREE-FORM CHAT WITH SCENARIO-BASED COMMUNICATION

Instead of open-ended messaging, users sent predefined requests: deadline extensions, revision requests, and other scenarios. This reduced unnecessary communication, sped up approvals, and stopped advertisers from having to educate bloggers.

04 ADDED A REQUIRED SELF-CHECK BEFORE SUBMITTING EACH STEP

Before submitting each step, the user confirmed the most common requirements for that stage, helping reduce revisions and check their own work.

Results

Support requests

↓

fewer support requests about the integration process

Start → Complete integration

75% → 82%

conversion from starting an integration

to completing it increased

Average revisions per integration

~3 → ~1

average revisions per integration for new bloggers decreased x3

Average integration time

↓

integrations are completed faster thanks

to fewer revision iterations

THANKS FOR SCROLLING,

COME BACK WITH AN OFFER

Telegram

LinkedIn

ostrostrow@gmail.com

©

2026 SOFIA RUDAKOVA — ALL PIXELS RESERVED